The compatibility of the deontic indicator with a communicative verb in 1st-person modal constructions: semantics and pragmatics (based on Russian and German languages)

Authors

  • Anna W. Sytko German Phonetics and Grammar Department, Minsk State Linguistic University, Zacharov str., 21, Minsk 220034, Republic of Belarus

Abstract

The paper explores the functional characteristics of deontic constructions with communicative verbs in two different-structured languages, in Russian and German. The material for statistical and contextual analysis was retrieved from the National Corpus of the Russian language. The research uses the method of semantic analysis and quantitative method. First person modal constructions (1st person Singular and Plural) with communicative verbs are modalized performatives, they are language universal. Their pragmatic characteristics are revealed: designation of the communicative significance of the subsequent proposition and labeling of categoricality. The study shows that that mandatory components — communicative verbs and deontic markers, — as well as optional components, independently and in interaction, are involved in modifying the categoricity of the deontic construction. Quantitative data of deontic constructions with different filling based on National Corpuses are presented. The inner syntactics of deontic constructions is empirically determined. Considering the distribution of deontic constructions, nuclear constructions are identified, they are different in communicative-intentional content: with the verbs skazat’ — sagen, priznat’ — gestehen. The study shows that the syntagmatics of construction is affected by the type of modal subject — I or We. The frequent speech preferences in the filling of the deontic structure, determined by semantic and pragmatic factors, are established. The analysis found that deontic markers of the Russian language make enables expressing more accurately nuance modal-pragmatic meanings.

Keywords:

deontic construction, communicative verb, speech verb, deontic marker, deontic predicate, pragmatic characteristic, categoricality, communicative relevance, compatibility

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Литература

Баранов А. Н. Заметки о дескать и мол // Вопросы языкознания. 1994. № 4. С. 114–124.

Бенвенист Э. Общая лингвистика / пер. с фр. М.: Прогресс, 1974. 448 с.

Булыгина Т. В., Шмелев А. Д. Языковая концептуализация мира (на материале русской грамматики). М.: Школа «Языки русской культуры», 1997. 576 с.

Добровольский Д. О., Падучева Е. В. Высказывания от 1-го лица: семантика и прагматика // Логический анализ языка: Моно-, диа-, полилог в разных языках и культурах. М.: Индрик, 2010. С. 104–121.

Зализняк А. А., Падучева Е. В. Предикаты пропозициональной установки в модальном контексте // Логический анализ языка: Проблемы интенсиональных и прагматических контекстов. М.: Наука, 1989. С. 92–115.

Кобозева И. М., Лауфер Н. И. Семантика модальных предикатов долженствования // Логический анализ языка: Культурные концепты. М.: Наука, 1991. С. 169–175.

Лауфер Н. И. Предикативы со значением необходимости: статистика и семантика: (Корпусное исследование) // Компьютерная лингвистика и интеллектуальные технологии: По материалам ежегодной Междунар. конф. «Диалог». М.: Изд-во Рос. гос. гуманит. ун-та, 2007. С. 353–358. http://www.dialog-21.ru/media/1874/53.pdf (дата обращения: 12.01.2020).

Падучева Е. В. Высказывание и его соотнесенность с действительностью: референциальные аспекты семантики местоимений. 5-е изд., испр. М.: ЛКИ, 2008. 296 с.

Рябцева Н. К. Ментальные перформативы в научном дискурсе // Вопросы языкознания. 1992. № 4. С. 12–28.

Степанов Ю. С. Имена. Предикаты. Предложения: Семиологическая грамматика. М.: Наука, 1981. 361 с.

Gloning Th. Modalisierte Sprechakte mit Modalverben: Semantische, pragmatische und sprachgeschichtliche Untersuchungen // Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen / hrsg. von G. Fritz, Th. Gloning. Tübingen: Walter de Gruyter, 1997. S. 307–437.

Goldberg A. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1995. 271 p.

Lyons J. Semantics: in 2 vols. Vol. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1977. P. 372–897 [continued numbering of volumes].

Nuyts J. The Modal Confusion: On Terminology and the Concepts Behind It // Modality: Studies in Form and Function / ed. by A. Klinge, H. Müller. London: Equinox, 2005. Р. 5–38.

Stubbs M. Corpus Semantics // Routledge Handbook of Semantic / ed. by N. Riemer. London: Routledge, 2016. Р. 106–121.


References

Baranov A. N. Notes on deskat’ and mol. Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 1994, no. 4, pp. 114–124. (In Russian)

Benvenistе É. General Linguistics, transl. from French. Rus. ed. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1974, 448 p. (In Russian)

Bulygina T. V., Shmelev A. D. Linguistic Conceptualization of the World (Based on Russian Grammar). Moscow, Shkola «Iazyki russkoi kul’tury» Publ., 1997, 576 p. (In Russian).

Dobrovol’skii D. O., Paducheva E. V. Statements from the 1st Person: Semantics and Pragmatics. Logicheskii analiz iazyka. Mono-, dia-, polilog v raznykh iazykakh i kul’turakh. Moscow, Indrik Publ., 2010, pp. 104–121. (In Russian)

Zalizniak A. A., Paducheva E. V. Predicates of Propositional Attitude in a Modal Context. Logicheskii analiz iazyka: Problemy intensional’nykh i pragmaticheskikh kontekstov. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1989, pp. 92–115. (In Russian)

Kobozeva I. M., Laufer N. I. Semantics of Modal Predicates of Obligation. Logicheskii analiz iazyka: Kul’turnye kontsepty. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1991, pp. 169–175. (In Russian)

Laufer N. I. Predicatives with the Meaning of Necessity: Statistics and Semantics (Corpus Research). Komp’iuternaia lingvistika i intellektual’nye tekhnologii: Po materialam iezhegodnoi Mezhdunar. konf. «Dialog». Moscow, Izd-vo Ros. gos. gumanit. un-ta Publ., 2007, pp. 353–358. http://www.dialog-21.ru/media/1874/53.pdf (accessed date: 12.01.2020). (In Russian)

Paducheva E. V. Utterance and Its Correlation with Reality: Referential Aspects of Pronoun Semantics, 5th ed., rev. Moscow, LKI Publ., 2008, 296 p. (In Russian)

Riabtseva N. K. Mental Performatives in Scientific Discourse: Voprosy iazykoznaniia, 1992, no. 4, pp. 12–28. (In Russian)

Stepanov Iu. S. Names. Predicates. Sentences: Semiological Grammar. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1981, 361 p. (In Russian)

Gloning Th. Modalisierte Sprechakte mit Modalverben: Semantische, pragmatische und sprachgeschichtliche Untersuchungen. Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen, ed. by G. Fritz, Th. Gloning. Tübingen, Walter de Gruyter, 1997, pp. 307–437.

Goldberg A. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1995, 271 p.

Lyons J. Semantics, in 2 vols., vol. 2. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1977, pp. 372–897 [continued numbering of volumes].

Nuyts J. The Modal Confusion: On Terminology and the Concepts Behind It. Modality: Studies in Form and Function, ed. by A. Klinge, H. Müller. London, Equinox, 2005, pp. 5–38.

Stubbs M. Corpus Semantics. Routledge Handbook of Semantics, ed. by N. Riemer. London, Routledge, 2016, pp. 106–121.

Published

2021-09-15

How to Cite

Sytko, A. W. (2021). The compatibility of the deontic indicator with a communicative verb in 1<sup>st</sup>-person modal constructions: semantics and pragmatics (based on Russian and German languages). German Philology at the St Petersburg State University , 11, 109–131. Retrieved from https://germanphilology.spbu.ru/article/view/12272

Issue

Section

Contrastive lexicology and grammar