LINGUISTIC PECULIARITIES OF GERMAN-LANGUAGE ELECTION SLOGANS (on the material of election campaigns in 2017 and 2021)

Authors

  • Elena V. Zuevskaya Minsk State Linguistic University, Address: 21, ul. Zakharova, Minsk, 220034, Republic of Belarus
  • Darya O. Ilyankova Minsk State Linguistic University, Address: 21, ul. Zakharova, Minsk, 220034, Republic of Belarus https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7099-5080

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2024.113

Abstract

The article analyses the linguistic features of German-language election slogans on the material of election campaigns of five parties in 2017 and 2021. The study establishes the relationship between the characteristic features of political discourse, its strategies and syntactic features. In accordance with the desire to express ideas as briefly as possible, preference is given to simple extended sentences, which allow to compress the meaning into a maximally memorable and easily perceived form. At the same time, the authors regularly resort to language play, which makes it possible to fill the statements with new layers of meaning in their characteristic form, causing the recipient’s involuntary desire to make a cognitive effort to understand the author’s intention. The peculiarities of the reflection of sentence categories — modality, temporality and authorisation — in pre-election political slogans have been determined. It has been established that there is a turning away from direct influence on the addressee, grammatical, lexical and graphic means serve to win the votes of voters with minimal imperative influence on them, what is used mainly to reduce the degree of aggressiveness. The category of temporality is constantly reflected in German-language election slogans, but it is not always explicated by verbal means. Most slogans are oriented towards future time, potential changes, actualising the predictive function of slogans. The established predominant deauthorisation of political advertising texts can be explained by the principle of reductionism and the desire for a more neutral design of statements, and the visual design helps to “authorise” advertising.

Keywords:

political discourse, election slogan, syntax, modality, temporality

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biographies

Elena V. Zuevskaya, Minsk State Linguistic University, Address: 21, ul. Zakharova, Minsk, 220034, Republic of Belarus

Candidate of Philological Sciences, Head of the Department of Theory and Practice of German, Minsk State Linguistic University

Darya O. Ilyankova, Minsk State Linguistic University, Address: 21, ul. Zakharova, Minsk, 220034, Republic of Belarus

Master Student of the Faculty of German, Minsk State Linguistic University

References

Источники иллюстративного материала

lpb. Landeszentrale für politische Bildung Baden-Württemberg. URL: https://www.bundestagswahl-bw.de (дата обращения: 10.12.2022).


Литература

Бахтин М.М. Проблема речевых жанров // Собрание сочинений в 7 т. Т. 5. Работы 1940-х — начала 1960-х годов. М.: Русские словари, 1996. С. 159– 207.

Болотнова Н.С. Филологический анализ текста: учеб. пособие. 3-е изд. М.: Флинта: Наука, 2007. 520 с.

Боднарук Е.В. Модальные глаголы в современном немецком языке: систематизация значений // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2019. Вып. 1 (817). С. 66–79.

Дейк Т.А. ван. Язык. Познание. Коммуникация / пер. с англ. М: Прогресс, 1989. 308 c.

Попова Е.В. Предвыборный дискурс — многовекторность лингвистического исследования // Проблемы современной науки. Выпуск 5. Часть 1. Ставрополь: Логос, 2012. С. 46–50.

Рюкова А.Р., Филимонова Е.А. Языковые способы реализации персуазивности // Вестник Башкирского университета. 2016. T. 21. No 2. С. 23–26.

Тортунова И.А. Жанрово-стилистический портрет современного политического лозунга // Научный диалог. 2015. No 9 (45). C. 100–111.

Хабибуллина Ф.Я., Трапезникова Г.А. Функционирование афоризмов-лозунгов в политическом дискурсе разноструктурных языков // Вестник Московского государственного лингвистического университета. Гуманитарные науки. 2016. Вып. 2 (741). С. 106–121.

Чудинов А.П. Политическая лингвистика: учеб. пособие. М.: Флинта; Наука, 2006. 256 с.

Dorenbeck N. Wähler gewinnen oder verlieren? Linke Rhetorik im Bundestagswahlkampf 2021 // Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur. 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03. S. 313–328.

Klemm M., Michel S. (Social-Media-)Wahlkampfrhetorik von Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen // Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur. 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03. S. 281–296.

Völker H., Spieß C. Kontinuität oder Wandel? Zur Wahlkampfsprache von CDU/CSU im Bundestagswahlkampf 2021 // Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur. 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03. S. 264–280.

Wengeler M. „Respekt für dich. Kompetenz für Deutschland“. Zur Wahlkampfkommunikation der SPD im Bundestags-wahlkampf 2021 // Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur. 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03. S. 249–263.


References

Bakhtin M.M. The Problem of Speech Genres. Sobranie sochinenii v 7 t. T.5. Raboty 1940-kh — nachala 1960-kh godov. Moscow, Russkie slovari Publ., 1996, pp. 159–207. (In Russian)

Bodnaruk E.V. Modal Verbs in Modern German: Systematisation of Meanings. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2019, iss. 1 (817), pp. 66–79. (In Russian)

Bolotnova N.S. Philological Analysis of the Text: Textbook. 3rd ed. Moscow, Flinta Publ.; Nauka Publ., 2007. 520 p. (In Russian)

Chudinov A.P. Political Linguistics: Textbook. Moscow, Flinta Publ.; Nauka Publ., 2006. 256 p. (In Russian)

Dijk T.A. van. Language. Cognition. Communication. Transl. from English. Moscow, Progress Publ., 1989. 308 p. (In Russian)

Dorenbeck N. Wähler gewinnen oder verlieren? Linke Rhetorik im Bundestagswahlkampf 2021. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur, 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03, S. 313–328.

Khabibullina F.Ia., Trapeznikova G.A. Functioning of Aphorisms-slogans in Political Discourse of Differently Structured Languages. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo lingvisticheskogo universiteta. Gumanitarnye nauki, 2016, iss. 2 (741), pp. 106–121. (In Russian)

Klemm M., Michel S. (Social-Media-)Wahlkampfrhetorik von Bündnis 90 / Die Grünen. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur. 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03, S. 281–296.

Popova E.V. Pre-election Discourse — the Multidirectionality of Linguistic Research. Problemy sovremennoi nauki, iss. 5, part 1. Stavropol’: Logos Publ., 2012, pp. 46–50. (In Russian)

Riukova A.R., Filimonova E.A. Language Ways of Realising Persuasiveness. Vestnik Bashkirskogo universiteta, 2016, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 23–26. (In Russian)

Tortunova I.A. Genre-stylistic Portrait of a Modern Political Slogan. Nauchnyi dialog, 2015, no. 9 (45), pp. 100–111. (In Russian)

Völker H., Spieß C. Kontinuität oder Wandel? Zur Wahlkampfsprache von CDU/CSU im Bundestagswahlkampf 2021. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur. 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03, S. 264–280.

Wengeler M. „Respekt für dich. Kompetenz für Deutschland“. Zur Wahlkampfkommunikation der SPD im Bundestagswahlkampf 2021. Aptum. Zeitschrift für Sprachkritik und Sprachkultur. 17. Jahrgang, 2021, Heft 03, S. 249–263.

Published

2025-03-25

How to Cite

Zuevskaya, E. V., & Ilyankova, D. O. (2025). LINGUISTIC PECULIARITIES OF GERMAN-LANGUAGE ELECTION SLOGANS (on the material of election campaigns in 2017 and 2021). German Philology at the St Petersburg State University , 14, 260–274. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2024.113

Issue

Section

II. GERMAN MULTILEVEL UNITS IN TEXT AND DISCOURSE