LINGUISTIC POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN CORPORATE DISCOURSE (by the example of corporate codes of conduct of companies)

Authors

  • Natalia D. Imeretinskaya St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2023.105

Abstract

This article attempts to study linguistic politeness strategies in corporate discourses with means of linguopragmatic analysis of Codes of Conducts, available on the Internet open sources. Codes of Conduct are meant to evoke in the addressee (company employees, business partners, customers, government agencies, or society as a whole) a positive impression, while formulating corporate behavior norms obligatory for the employees and partners to comply with. Being a set of directive and commission speech acts, on the one hand, and on the other hand, being a document that forms the image of the company, Codes of Conduct represent an interesting material for the analysis of the ways to reduce face-threatening acts. The methodological basis of the undertaken research are the communication theory, corporate discourse and the sociolinguistic postulates of Brown and Levinson’s Theory of Politeness. Politeness, as an essential condition for any kind of communication, is a social and cultural phenomenon, as it signifies linguistic features associated with norms of social behavior. Respectful attitude towards each other correlates in business communication with superior-subordinate relationship. Social norms or behavioral rules adopted in corporate discourse determine the speaker’s choice of politeness strategies and linguistic features. The article analyzes linguistic politeness strategies, aimed to reduce communicative pressure within the directive speech act, as well as interaction of these strategies and their linguistic execution. The most often-used politeness strategies to be find in Codes of Conduct are use of in-group identity markers and stating a directive speech act as a general rule or a practice already established in a company.

Keywords:

corporate discourse, directive speech act, category of politeness, politeness strategies, face threatening speech act

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.
 

Author Biography

Natalia D. Imeretinskaya, St. Petersburg State University, 7–9, Universitetskaya nab., St. Petersburg, 199034, Russia

Assistant of German Philology Department, St. Petersburg State University,
Candidate of Philological Sciences.

References

Литература

Арутюнова Н. Д. Язык и мир человека. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1998. 896 с.

Гурьева З. И. Бизнес-текст как явление культуры // Язык. Этнос. Сознание. Материалы международной научной конференции (24–25 апреля 2003 г.). Майкоп: Издательство Адыгейского государственного университета. 2003. Т. 2. С. 38–46.

Данюшина Ю. В. Бизнес-лингвистика — новое синергетическое направление прикладной лингвистики // Вестник ЛГУ им. А. С. Пушкина. 2010. № 2. С. 133–140.

Ларина Т. В. Категория вежливости и стиль коммуникации (Сопоставление русских и английских культурных традиций). М.: Рукописные памятники Древней Руси, 2009. 512 с.

Мюллер П., Кизер А. Организационная коммуникация. Харьков: Гуманитарный центр, 2005. 438 с.

Саркисян Г. А. Этический кодекс в документно-лингвистическом и информационном аспектах: автореф. дис … канд. филол. наук. Тула, Издательство Тульского государственного университета, 2014. 18 с. URL: https://www.elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=30402843&ysclid=lnc46q5oje561895001 (дата обращения: 04.10.2023).

Степанов Ю. С. Язык и метод. К современной философии языка. М.: Языки русской культуры, 1998. 771 с.

Тесакова Н. В. Миссия и Корпоративный кодекс. М.: РИП-холдинг, 2003. 187 с.

Формановская Н. И. Коммуникативно-прагматические аспекты единиц общения. М.: Икар, 1998. 291 с.

Шефер О. В. PR-дискурс в копоративном ньюcмейкинге // Вестник Омского государственного педагогического университета. Гуманитарные исследования. Научный журнал. 2016. № 1 (10). С. 116–119.

Шипицына Г. М., Полякова Е. С. Этические кодексы современных российских банков и компаний // Вестник БГТУ им. В. Г. Шухова, 2011. № 2. С. 165–169.

Brinker K. Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Berlin: Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1985. 150 S.

Brown P., Levinson S. D. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987. 333 p.

Genzmer H. Deutsche Grammatik. 1. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main; Berlin: Insel-Verlag, 1995. 384 S.

Goffman E. On Face work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction // Communication in face-to-face-Interaction / eds Laver J., Hutcheson S. Harmondsworth: Penguin, 1972. P. 319–436.

Jones E., Watson B., Gardner J. Organizational Communication: Challenges for the New Century // Journal of Communication. 2004. December. P. 722–750.

Lakoff R. The Logic of politeness or minding your p’s and q’s // Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973. P. 292–305.

Leech G. N. Thomas J. Language, Meaning and Context pragmatics // An encyclopedia of language / ed. by N. E. Collinge. London, New York: Routledge, 1990. P. 173–207.

Leech N. G. Principles of pragmatics. London, New York: Longman, 1983. 264 p.

Searle J. R. Speech Acts. An assay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969. 203 p. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139173438

Yamada H. Topic management and turn distribution in business meeting American versus Japanese strategies // Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse. 1990. Vol. 10, no. 3. P. 271–295.

References

Arutyunova N. D. Language and the human world. Moscow, Iazyki russkoi cul’tury Publ., 1998, 896 p. (In Russian)

Brinker K. Linguistische Textanalyse. Eine Einführung in Grundbegriffe und Methoden. Berlin, Erich Schmidt Verlag, 1985, 150 S.

Brown P., Levinson S. D. Politeness. Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, 333 p.

Danyushina Y. V. Business linguistics — a new synergetic direction of applied linguistics. Bulletin of A. S. Pushkin Leningrad State University, 2010, no. 2, pp. 133-140. (In Russian)

Formanovskaya N. I. Communicative-pragmatic aspects of communication units. Moscow, Ikar Publ., 1998, 291 p. (In Russian)

Genzmer H. Deutsche Grammatik. 1. Aufl. Frankfurt am Main, Berlin, Insel-Verlag, 1995, 384 S.

Goffman E. On Face work: an analysis of ritual elements in social interaction. On Face Work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction. Communication in Face-to-Face-Interaction, eds Laver J., Hutcheson S., Harmondsworth, Penguin, 1972, pp. 319–436.

Gurieva Z. I. Business-text as a phenomenon of culture. Language. Ethnos. Consciousness. Materials of the international scientific conf. (24-25 April 2003),

Maykop, Adygeya State University Publ., 2003, vol. 2, pp. 38–46. (In Russian)

Jones E., Watson B., Gardner J. Organizational Communication: Challenges for the New Century. Journal of Communication. 2004, December, pp. 722–750.

Lakoff R. The Logic of politeness or minding your p’s and q’s. Papers from the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, University of Chicago Press, 1973, pp. 292–305.

Larina T. V. Category of politeness and communication style (Comparison of Russian and English cultural traditions). Moscow, Rukopisnye pamiatniki Drevnei Rusi Publ., 2009, 512 p. (In Russian)

Leech G. N. Thomas J. Language, Meaning and Context pragmatics. An encyclopedia of language, ed. by N. E. Collinge. London; New York, Routledge, 1990, pp. 173–207.

Leech N. G. Principles of pragmatics. London; New York, Longman, 1983, 264 p.

Mueller A. P., Kizer A. Business communication. Kharkiv, Gumanitarnyi tsentr Publ., 2005, 438 p. (In Russian)

Sarkisian G. A. Code of Conduct in Documentary-Linguistic and Informational Aspects. PhD Abstract. Tula, Tula State University Publ., 2014, 18 p. (In Russian)

Searle J. R. Speech Acts. An assay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1969, 203 p.

Shefer O. V. PR discourse in corporate newsmaking. Newsletter of Omsk State Pedagogical University. Humanitarian Research. Scientific journal, 2016, no. 1 (10), pp. 116–119. (In Russian)

Shipitsyna G. M., Polyakova E. S. Ethical codes of modern Russian banks and companies. Bulletin of BSTU named after V. G. Shukhov, 2011, no. 2, pp. 165–169. (In Russian)

Stepanov Y. S. Language and Method. Toward a contemporary philosophy of language. Moscow, Iazyki russkoi kul’tury Publ., 1998, 771 p. (In Russian)

Tesakova N. V. Mission and Corporate Code. Moscow, RIP-holding Publ., 2003, 187 p. (In Russian)

Yamada H. Topic management and turn distribution in business meeting American versus Japanese strategies. Text. Interdisciplinary Journal for the Study of Discourse, 1990, no. 10, no. 3, pp. 271–295.

Published

2024-06-12

How to Cite

Imeretinskaya, N. D. (2024). LINGUISTIC POLITENESS STRATEGIES IN CORPORATE DISCOURSE (by the example of corporate codes of conduct of companies). German Philology at the St Petersburg State University , 13, 94–118. https://doi.org/10.21638/spbu33.2023.105

Issue

Section

I. ТНЕ CATEGORY OF POLITENESS IN SCIENCE AND BUSINESS COMMUNICATION